<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/news/rss.php">
    <title>The Numbers</title>
    <description>
      Latest box office news from the web's leading movie box office web site
    </description>
    <link>http://www.the-numbers.com</link>

    <textinput rdf:resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/doSearch.php" />

    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5430" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5429" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5428" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5427" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5426" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5425" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5424" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5423" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5422" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5421" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5430">
<title>American First</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5430</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

It's the Labor Day long weekend and <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/AVPGM.php">The American</A> it getting a jump on the competition by opening tonight. There have been several Wednesday releases this summer, including a few by non-blockbuster films like <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/VAMPM.php">Vampires Suck</A> and <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/KNDAY.php">Knight and Day</A>. So how will this one compare? 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5429">
<title>International Box Office: Expendables Remain Essential</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5429</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

<!--- $24.70 million --->
<A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/XPNDB.php">The Expendables</A> held on to top spot on the international chart with $24.70 million on 4823 screens in 38 markets for a total of $101.46 million after just three weeks of release. It had a few openings over the weekend, most notably in Germany where it placed third with $2.94 million on 531 screens. Meanwhile, it fell from first to fourth in the U.K., but still added $2.02 million on 453 screens over the weekend for a total of $10.52 million after two. With openings in Italy and Japan ahead, the film will have no trouble getting to $250 million worldwide, which is more than enough to ensure a profit. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5428">
<title>2010 Preview: September</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5428</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

Summer has ended and while there were some bigger than expected hits in <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5329">August</A>, this trend is unlikely to continue in September. There are four weekends this September and nearly a dozen films opening wide, plus a few more that may or may not open wide. Of all of those films, maybe three of four will be midlevel hits, while only one film, <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/GHOOL.php">Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole 3D</A>, has a real shot at reaching the $100 million milestone. This is compared to <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=4462">last year</A> when we had two $100 million hits; granted, one of those was <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2009/PNACT.php">Paranormal Activity</A>, which didn't expand truly wide till Halloween. Hopefully 2010 can gain ground on 2009 overall, even if it doesn't have as many $100 million hits. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5427">
<title>IMAX: Avatar is Special on IMAX</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5427</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

The Special Edition release of <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2009/AVATR.php">Avatar</A> pulled in $1.5 million domestically and $560,000 internationally for $2.06 million worldwide. In other IMAX news, it was reported that <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/people/directors/JWOO.php">John Woo</A> will be shooting his next movie, <I>Flying Tigers</I>, and it will be converted to the IMAX format. First <I>Aftershocks</I> and now this film. The trend I <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5342">predicted</A> at the beginning of the month is quickly coming true. <I>Flying Tigers</I> begins shooting next spring. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5426">
<title>Contest: Not the Last Chance to Win: Winning Announcement</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5426</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>
The winners of our <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5395">Not the Last Chance to Win</A> contest were determined and they are...
]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5425">
<title>Top of Per Theater Chart is up for the Taking</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5425</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

No film was able to top the $10,000 mark on the per theater chart with <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/TAKER.php">Takers</A> coming very close with an average of $9,298. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5424">
<title>DVD Sales: Last Soars to First</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5424</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

<A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5382">New releases</A> this week were dominated by <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/LSONG.php">The Last Song</A>, which outsold the second place film on this week's <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/dvd/charts/weekly/2010/20100822.php">sales chart</A> by a two-to-one margin. It won the week with 761,000 units and $13.69 million in revenue. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5423">
<title>Takers Take Top Spot</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5423</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

There was an upset at the box office with <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/TAKER.php">Takers</A> pulling out a last minute win. However, it wasn't enough for the overall box office, as that sunk 12% from last weekend to $113 million. More importantly, it was down nearly 10% from <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/charts/weekly/2009/20090828.php">last year</A>. 2010 still has a $300 million lead over 2009 at $7.53 billion to $7.23 billion and I'm not concerned about the big picture, yet. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5422">
<title>DVD and Blu-ray Releases for August 31st, 2010</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5422</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>
<div style="float: right; margin: 4px;">
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=thenumbers&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B003NOGNQU&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&lc1=0000FF&bc1=FFFFFF&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr&nou=1" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>
<P>

It's a devastatingly slow week on the home market when it comes to first run releases with only a couple making an appearance, and combined these two films failed to reach $100 million at the box office. There are a few TV on DVD releases that try to make up the difference, but overall it is still a very slow week. Looking at the best of the best, <A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/people/series/HouseMD.php">House, M.D.</A>: Season Six on <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/House-M-D-Season-Hugh-Laurie/dp/B002JVWR7M?tag=thenumbers" target="_NewWindow">DVD</A> or <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/House-M-D-Season-Six-Blu-ray/dp/B002JVWR7W?tag=thenumbers" target="_NewWindow">Blu-ray</A> gets serious consideration for Pick of the Week, but that honor goes to <I>Thriller: The Complete Series</I> on <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Thriller-Complete-Boris-Karloff/dp/B003NOGNQU?tag=thenumbers" target="_NewWindow">DVD</A>. 

]]></description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5421">
<title>Featured TV on DVD Review: Brothers and Sisters: Complete Fourth Season</title>
<link>http://www.the-numbers.com/interactive/newsStory.php?newsID=5421</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>

<div style="float: right; margin: 4px;">
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=thenumbers&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B003F3NE7K&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&lc1=0000FF&bc1=FFFFFF&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr&nou=1" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>
<P>

<A HREF="http://www.the-numbers.com/people/series/BrothersAndSisters.php">Brothers and Sisters</A> is a family drama with an impressive cast that began its run in 2006. I've reviewed the previous three seasons and can sum them up thusly... Season One: Too many characters meant it took a while for the show to get going, but once it did, it was compelling. Season Two: The writers' strike meant it was shortened significantly and like many similar shows, this causes problems and the quality slipped. Season Three: We went from family drama to dangerously close to soap opera territory. So how does <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Brothers-Sisters-Complete-Fourth-Season/dp/B003F3NE7K?tag=thenumbers" target="_NewWindow">Season Four</A> compare? 

]]></description>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>