|As an Actor||Supporting||5||$103,009,287||$78,727,744||$181,737,031|
|Best known as a Supporting Actress based on credits in that role in 5 films, with $181,737,031 worldwide aggregate box office (rank #14,948)|
|Best-Known Acting Roles: Alice (Southpaw), Ashley (Sinister), Peggy (Mistress America)|
|Most productive collaborators: Ethan Hawke, Scott Derrickson, Juliet Rylance, Fred Dalton Thompson, C. Robert Cargill|
February 19th, 2013
Sinister is a horror film that opened early in October. Its early reviews were incredible, but by the time it opened its Tomatometer Score fell to just over the overall positive level. This suggests the studio was able to show the film to genre critics, who were more likely to give the film a positive review, before the overall community saw it. I don't begrudge them for doing this. After all, it makes total sense for the studio to want the early good reviews and the genre critics are the ones mostly likely to jump at the chance to review a horror film. And in the end, it still earned good reviews. But does this mean it will be seen as a classic by fans of the genre and only okay by others? And is an okay horror film still worth picking up for casual fans of the genre.
|10/7/2016||The Great Gilly Hopkins||Agnes||$0||$50,890||$50,890|
|7/25/2014||Very Good Girls||Phoebe||$0||$0||$0|