| || ||Movies||Domestic|
|As an Actor||Supporting||15||$911,029,026||$1,343,007,873||$2,254,036,899|
|Lead Ensemble Member||1||$1,013,945||$67,693,174||$68,707,119|
This graph shows Thomas Kretschmann’s score on our annual analysis of leading stars at the box office. The Star Score represents points assigned to each of the leading stars of the top 100 movies (based on box office) in the current year and two preceding years. For appearing in the number one movie in a year a star gets 100 points, the number two movie 99 points and so on..
Latest Ranking on Selected Box Office Record Lists
|Top 100 Stars in Leading Roles at the Domestic Box Office (Rank 3,301-3,400)
|Top Stars at the Domestic Box Office (Rank 801-900)
|Top 100 Stars in Leading Roles at the International Box Office (Rank 1,301-1,400)
|Top Stars at the International Box Office (Rank 601-700)
|Top 100 Stars in Leading Roles at the Worldwide Box Office (Rank 1,801-1,900)
|Top Stars at the Worldwide Box Office (Rank 601-700)
See the Acting Credits tab for all Acting Box Office Records and the Technical Credits tab for all Technical Box Office Records.
December 28th, 2015
It's been a few weeks since I did a review. I stopped taking screeners knowing how busy Star Wars: The Force Awakens would keep me, but I figured I should get back in the game. However, there was a question of what late review would be worth checking out? Well, there have been five $1 billion movies to come out this year and I've previously reviewed all of the ones that hit the home market. All of them, but one: The Avengers: Age of Ultron. Of the five $1 billion movies, this one is arguably the one that had the most disappointing run at the box office. Yes, a film that made $1.40 billion worldwide was seen as a box office disappointment by some. This is mostly because its predecessor, The Avengers, broke box office records. The film also earned much weaker reviews than the first movie, but still earned 75% positive reviews, which is very good for a wide release. Is it a real disappointment? Or does it hold up compared to the competition?
January 27th, 2014
Dario Argento is a master of the horror genre. In fact, he helped change the genre and his influence is still felt today. However, it has been nearly 20 years since a film of his has earned overall positive reviews, and nearly 30 years since his last great movie. Will Argento's Dracula be the film that turns his recent streak around? Or is it more of the same weak releases he's put out in the past two decades?